Reveller Guerrilla

Here we are searching for a sign
Here we are searching for a sign

It’s the end here today
But I will build a new beginning
Take some time, find a place
And I will start my own religion

As the day divides the night
Here we are searching for a sign

Watch the men multiply
See them ease out of the circle
Watch your friends run and hide
Help them fall back in this cycle

Here we are searching…

You saw what you get
If you take what you take
Look in the eye of the test
It’s all because
Now there’s a feeling I get
When I look to the left
But it should never be sensed
Our searching for a sign

Can you feel it?
Things are changing
Can you see it?
Watch as the worlds collide
Can you see it?
Can you feel it?
Watch as the worlds
Collide…..into themselves
Collide…..into themselves

Another time, another place
Another time, another place
Some paradigm has shunned the race
Some paradigm has shunned the race

Searching

You saw what you get
If you take what you take
Look in the eye of the test
It’s all because
Now there’s a feeling I get
When I look to the left
But it should never be sensed
Our searching for a sign

You saw what you get
If you take what you take
Look in the eye of the test
It’s all because
Now there’s a feeling I get
When I look to the left
But it should never be sensed
Our searching for a sign

We shall start off with this pantun;

“Angkut angkut terbang ke langit,
sampai di langit dimakan merbah,
biar bertangkup bumi dan langit,
setia hamba tidak berubah.”

Those were the words of an Umno Deputy President during an Umno
General Assembly in the not too distant past. During the good old days
some would have reckoned. Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim verbalized his
undivided loyalty towards his mentor, Datuk Seri (now Tun) Dr
Mahathir Mohamad by reciting this pantun at the end of the Umno General
Assembly in 1996. The affection being shown at that time by the PM
towards his successor was for all to see. Only the most clairvoyant
among us can predict what could have been unfold in the next two years
after the pantun was recited and immortalized in the annals of Umno
history.

“The prodigal son and the father figure”

This fiery pantun, which embodied an absolute and undying loyalty of
a man towards his President no matter what may come, had been truly
forgotten by Anwar Ibrahim as he became the fiercest critic to the very
same person he held in very high regard several years ago.

In 1996, Anwar was seen as Umno’s heir apparent to Dr Mahathir. Now,
in 2008, Anwar is still perceived as heir apparent and prime minister
in waiting to the current PM albeit from another political party. Who
is Anwar Ibrahim? How did he came about to be what he is today? A
political reformer? The people’s saviour? An opportunist? A power
hungry extremist?

In order to know a person, we need to know his character, his
current idealogy, his belief system, his principles or as some may say
it, his ‘centre of being’. We study this, and then we reflect on all
his actions through the years we’ve known him during the height of his
power, and only then we can gauge what kind of a man he is. As
what Abraham Lincoln once said - “Nearly all men can stand adversity,
but if you want to test a man’s character, give him power”.

Read the above pantun again. Has the earth and the sky flipped over each other?

From his May 2007 interview in BBC’s Hardtalk, we delve into the man which some touted as the next best thing in Malaysia.

The Anwar Ibrahim interview in BBC HardTalk           

The issue which was relentlessly hammered on to Anwar towards the
end of the interview was his integrity and credibility in leading the
fight against the blatant corruption within the Malaysian Government.
As the interviewer pointed out, he was in the system itself for nearly
2 decades and did not do anything about it. Although Anwar insisted he
fought against the tide, it were only in the forms of words. No actions
were done by him. In fact, his tenure as the Finance Minister from 1991
to 1998 was best remembered by his subtle manouevring in forcing Dr
Mahathir to resign as Prime Minister in the Umno General Assembly in
1998.

His message was conveyed in the form of his trusted
lieutenant, Datuk Zahid Hamidi, the Umno Youth Chief at the
time. Alleging that cronyism and nepotism were prevalent within
the Umno top hierarchy, and insinuating to the Umno members that Dr
Mahathir had too many cronies, it was time Dr Mahathir to pass on the
mantle of power to a cleaner leader. However, the plan backfired. We
can read to remember about this revelation in Business Times ( 23 June 1998 );

DATUK Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, the Umno
Youth chief, caused more than a bit of a stir when he spoke of
`nepotisma and kronisma’ at the Youth assembly last Thursday, forcing
the ensuing three-day Umno general assembly to debate issues associated
with these alien terms openly.

The party found itself on the defensive
because, as a member of the Umno supreme council, there were questions
as to whether Zahid had raised the issues at its meetings chaired by
the party president. It led to several significant things happening
during the assembly.

It prompted the Government to issue
several lists of names of so-called “Government cronies” who had been
awarded shares or privatization projects. They included the Prime
Minister’s son, the Deputy Prime Minister’s father and brother,
Cabinet ministers and members of parliament, aside from hundreds of
other names of “ordinary” Malays and Bumiputeras. Even Zahid’s name was
in one of the lists.

The finality of the findings destroyed Anwar’s reputation as the
leading reformer of clean governance as more evidence of his excesses
were exposed that year. One such excesses was the purported loss
of billions of ringgit in currency hedging by Bank Negara Malaysia.
In January 2008, Dr Mahathir had already toying with the idea of
capital controls but was shot down by Anwar. He favours the more risky
currency trading. As the result, when the ringgit devalued further that
month, he directed BNM to intervene;

KUALA LUMPUR 5 Jan. - Timbalan Perdana
Menteri, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim berkata, Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM)
dibenarkan untuk campur tangan dalam pasaran tukaran wang asing bagi
memastikan nilai ringgit dapat distabilkan.

Anwar yang mengulas mengenai kejatuhan
ringgit hari ini yang mencapai paras terendahnya 4.0550/50 berbanding
dolar Amerika, menegaskan BNM boleh campur tangan sekiranya keadaan itu
sangat diperlukan.

Dalam hubungan ini Anwar menegaskan,
kejatuhan ringgit sebenarnya disebabkan oleh beberapa faktor serantau
seperti nilai baht, peso, rupiah dan won (Korea Selatan).
    

Please note that he stated the ringgit
value fell due to external factors. Not due to Dr Mahathir’s fault as
he had always screamed after he was sacked from the cabinet. Two days
after making the statement above, the BNM used billions of ringgit to
stop the further slide as stated in the report below;

KUALA LUMPUR 7 Jan. - Ringgit menjunam
ke paras paling rendah terbaru pada 4.8800 berbanding dolar Amerika
sehingga terpaksa dipulihkan hari ini melalui campur tangan Bank Negara
Malaysia (BNM).

Timbalan Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, dalam satu kenyataan petang ini berkata, ”operasi-operasi campur tangan” telah dijalankan untuk memastikan keadaan stabil bagi membolehkan pasaran tukaran asing berjalan dengan cekap.

In the end, BNM lost billions as the ringgit sank further. Some speculated the loss reached up to RM30 billion ringgit, similar to the loss he was accountable in 1993. Obviously,
Dr Mahathir was furious. Anwar’s mistake was intolerable. But his next
action in the coming weeks was even more unforgivable by Dr Mahathir.
Anwar had invited the IMF to ‘help’ Malaysia’s ailing economy and the recent loss of wealth.

KUALA LUMPUR 9 Jan. - Timbalan Perdana
Menteri, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim telah mengundang Pengarah Urusan Dana
Kewangan Antarabangsa (IMF), Michel Camdessus melawat negara ini minggu
depan bagi membincangkan masalah ekonomi yang sedang melanda rantau ini.

”Dari situ kita dapat melihat
pandangannya serta langkah-langkah proaktif yang sesuai untuk kita
ambil,” kata beliau pada sidang akhbar selepas mempengerusikan
Mesyuarat Majlis Kewangan Negara 1998 di Kementerian Kewangan hari ini.

As the result of IMF’s prescription, the economy and
people’s purchasing power broke down. The IMF encouraged the Minister
of Finance to lift the prices of controlled food items
and increase the banking interest rates. Dr Mahathir was wary with the
IMF’s prescription. The people in our neighbouring countries Indonesia
and Thailand were already rioting due to the expensive cost of living.

KUALA LUMPUR 19 Jan. - Malaysia akan mengkaji
cadangan Dana Kewangan Antarabangsa (IMF) supaya kadar faedah tempatan
dinaikkan, kata Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Dr. Mahathir Mohamad hari
ini.

Cadangan
itu dikemukakan oleh Pengarah Urusan IMF, Michel Camdessus selepas
menemui Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim serta
pegawai-pegawai Perbendaharaan dan Bank Negara di sini minggu lepas.
 

But Anwar was adamant. He needed the people to riot on the streets.
President Soehatro was already shaky. A new leader was needed to take
over this country. He was going to blackmail Malaysia to
become the next prime minister through the use of the destructive IMF
treatment. In the end, the interest rates were increased. Some was as
high as 18%. The non performing loan criteria was shortened from 6
months to 3 months. As the result, the credit crunch in the country was
inevitable. By May 1998, President Soeharto resigned. But Indonesia
sank further in oblivion for many years after that.

“The leader whom had unified Indonesia as the biggest Muslim country in the world, was brought down by new type of colonialism”

Seeing Anwar was unable to lift Malaysia from the currency crisis,
Dr Mahathir appointed the more able Tun Daim Zainuddin as the Minister
of Special Functions to help alleviate the Malaysian economy. Anwar was
sidelined due to his culpability in managing the country finances. To
illustrate this point into perspective, a CFO of a company must surely
be sacked if he runs the company to the ground with his reckless
methods. That was what happened to Anwar Ibrahim. But Dr Mahathir was
still magnanimous in his actions. He was willing to forgive and forget
if Anwar would simply lay low for a little while. But matters were not
easily understood by Anwar.

Compounded further was the allegations in a DAP convention by Karpal Singh and poison pen letters in the Umno General Assembly that
Anwar Ibrahim was a homosexual. Karpal had even asked Dr Mahathir
why is he keeping such minister in the cabinet. Dr Mahathir brushed
aside these allegations initially.   

As a desperate act, Anwar employed a machiavellian tactic by using
Zahid Hamidi as a tool to incite hatred towards Dr Mahathir in the
Umno General Assembly in June 1998. The rest as they say, is history.

In the recent interview with BBC HardTalk,
Dr Mahathir mentioned that Anwar was blackmailing VK Lingam via the
secret recordings made in 2001. The allegations of fixing the
appointment of top judges in the country is not relevant to me. What is
more telling was the act of blackmailing VK Lingam itself. The one that
was taking the recording was non other than Loh Gwo Burne.

This political greenhorn, who is still learning to speak proper
Bahasa Malaysia, became the MP of Kelana Jaya under the PKR ticket in
2008 general election. Although Gwo Burne stated that he recorded the
conversation out of boredom, it was a full 14 minutes recording
nevertheless. He could test his new found camera at the time to record
everything else, but he chose to record VK Lingam’s conversation non
stop for the whole 14 minutes. Furthermore, what astonished me was the
fact that Anwar kept the original copy all this while. How did he get
the copy? From Gwo Burne himself no doubt.

Now, Gwo Burne is offering his seat for Anwar to contest in the possible by-election. That whole event was suspiciously conspired by Anwar. If blackmailing
is Anwar’s modus operandi in obtaining power and gaining political
mileage, we will see another round of surrendering our sovereignty to
foreign powers.

“Picture says a thousand words”

When he was inside the government, this was what he had to say;

BUKIT MERTAJAM 1 Feb. - Datuk
Seri Anwar Ibrahim menolak tanggapan sesetengah pemerhati Barat bahawa
kemelut ekonomi dan krisis mata wang di negara-negara Asia disebabkan
oleh pengurusan yang lembap, rasuah dan pelbagai gejala negatif lain.

Timbalan Perdana Menteri berkata,
mereka memberi gambaran seolah-olah ekonomi terjejas kerana pengurusan
yang lembap, gejala rasuah dan pertimbangan semata-mata untuk suku
sakat serta kepentingan sahabat handai dan keluarga.

Anwar yang juga Menteri Kewangan
berkata, kepincangan dan ketidakadilan juga berlaku di Barat dan salah
satunya ialah ketidakadilan sistem perdagangan dunia.

”Sistem perdagangan dunia memberi
kepentingan kepada negara-negara kaya dan negara-negara industri dan
pada masa yang sama menggunakan institusi antarabangsa mempertahankan
kepentingan mereka,” katanya lagi yang menganggap dakwaan yang dibuat
amat kritikal.

But he changed his tune when he was booted out from the
government. The man whom everyone in the Pakatan Rakyat idolizes as the
only clean and liberally democratic politician, has always been
the main protagonist of anti cronyism and nepotisme slogans after his
sacking. But people forget that underneath the seemingly clean image
lies several issues contradicting  and plaguing his reputation. As per
the news in Berita Harian ( 8 December 1998 );

Bapa Anwar miliki saham 20 syarikat
KUALA LUMPUR, Isnin - Ketika Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim dan
pengikutnya menuduh Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Dr Mahathir Mohamad,
mengamalkan kronisme, nepotisme dan kolusi, bekas Timbalan Perdana
Menteri itu membisu terhadap kepentingan perniagaan keluarga dan rakan
rapatnya. Senarai Pendaftar Syarikat menunjukkan anggota keluarga Anwar
dan rakan rapatnya adalah peneraju korporat yang penting.

And another speech he made in 1995 which greatly mirrored the situation in Pakatan Rakyat now; 

Anwar seru rakyat tolak Pas
HULU TERENGGANU, Selasa - Rakyat
diminta menolak Pas kerana bersandiwara kononnya memperjuangkan
kepentingan umat dan syiar Islam sedangkan pada masa sama membantu DAP
melenyapkan kepentingan serta masa depan orang Melayu
di Pulau Pinang, kata Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. Timbalan Perdana
Menteri menegaskan, sebagai contoh beliau mempunyai bukti bahawa calon
DAP yang bertanding menentangnya bagi kerusi Parlimen Permatang Pauh,
Abdul Raman Manap, adalah Timbalan Yang Dipertua Pas Bukit Mertajam.

Credibility and integrity throughout a political career is paramount
in becoming a great and respected leader. Inconsistency in political
principles tantamounts to losing both credibility and integrity. Anwar
Ibrahim has not properly addressed this. Changing his stand without
proper explanation and not supplementing any evidence towards
any doubts about his own inconsistent character will prove to be a bane
in gaining confidence from the rest of the nation.

As Stephen Covey once said - “In the last analysis, what we are communicates far more eloquently than anything we say or do”.

A political reformer? The people’s saviour? An opportunist? A power hungry extremist?

You be the judge.   

sumber: jebatmustdie.wordpress.com

Ogos 24th, 2008 oleh taminsari

PEMBELAMELAYU.COM

(aku x seblahi sapa2, saje je post kast sini. menarik)

Suasana politik tanahair telah sekali lagi menerima kejutan. Kali ini, seorang anak muda bernama Saiful Bukhari Azlan yang menganggap dirinya ‘tukang bancuh kopi’ Anwar Ibrahim telah melakukan sumpah laknat (mubahalah) di Masjid Wilayah Persekutuan, Kuala Lumpur dengan menyebut secara jelas bahawa Anwar telah meliwat beliau.

Keberanian anak muda tersebut adalah sebagai menunaikan janji beliau sebelum ini yang diumumkan oleh peguam beliau bahawa Saiful akan melakukan sumpah laknat sebaik sahaja selesai siasatan polis atas laporan yang telah beliau lakukan. Ternyata Saiful berani mengotakan janji beliau.

Malangnya sebaik sahaja beliau melaksanakan janji tersebut, pelbagai kecaman dan sindiran masih ditujukan kepada beliau terutamanya dari ahli-ahli politik pembangkang Melayu. Ada yang mengatakan bahawa sumpah tersebut menyerupai budaya Kristian kerana memegang Al Quran sebagaimana penganut Kristian memegang “Bible”.

Ada yang mempertikaikan kenapa perlu bersumpah di masjid malah ada golongan marhaen ‘paria’ pembangkang yang berterusan menganggap Saiful telah dibayar untuk melakukan sumpah tersebut. Tidak pula dinyatakan berapakah harga bayaran tersebut sehingga Saiful boleh mempermainkan sumpah dengan nama Allah.

Kalau setakat satu atau dua juta, rasanya lebih baik Saiful terus menjadi ‘barang mainan’ Anwar, maklumlah si Sukma pendatang asing pun boleh menjadi kaya raya kerana menjadi ‘tukang tahan’ Anwar.

Apa pun komen, sindiran dan kecaman dalam isu tersebut, ianya perlu diperhalusi secara lebih rasional dan saksama terhadap kedua-dua pihak. Saiful telah dijatuhkan hukuman oleh ‘mahkamah media pembangkang’ terlebih dahulu dari perlaksanaan sumpah yang beliau lakukan.

Peribadinya di calar, dicaci dan di perlekehkan sebegitu hina seolah-olah beliau telah membayar harga dirinya dengan wang ringgit yang banyak untuk kepentingan politik pihak tertentu. Belumpun selesai siasatan pihak polis, Saiful sebenarnya telah dijatuhkan hukuman dalam mahkamah politik pembangkang.

Amat malang bagi seorang anak muda yang baru ingin mengenal dunia telah diperlakukan sedemikian rupa tanpa sedikit pun diberi peluang dan ruang untuk membela diri. Beliau terpaksa ‘berperang’ secara berseorangan untuk membuktikan kebenaran dakwaan beliau menentang segerombolan pemimpin dan pakar strategi pihak pembangkang.

Apa yang menariknya, Saiful tidak pernah pun mengeluarkan sebarang kenyataan membalas kecaman Anwar dan rakan-rakannya terhadap beliau malah beliau tidak ada ruang untuk itu. Ruang yang ada pada beliau hanyalah di laman ‘friendster’, satu sudut mencari kawan secara maya. Apalah sangat pengaruhnya laman web tersebut kepada ahli-ahli politik negara dan masyarakat umumnya?

Namun begitu, satu sifat yang hebat pada Saiful ialah beliau sentiasa istiqamah dalam dakwaan beliau. Beliau dilihat lebih yakin dengan cerita liwat tersebut berbanding dengan Anwar yang sejak dari awal sentiasa ‘gabra’ sehingga terpaksa berlindung di sebuah kedutaan asing atas alasan keselamatan yang nyawanya dalam bahaya. Namun begitu, nampaknya ‘nyawa’ Anwar masih panjang dan sekarang ini sedang sibuk berkempen di seluruh pelosok kampung di Permatang Pauh tanpa rasa takut ‘dibunuh’ sebagaimana sebelum ini.

Mungkin ‘pembunuh’ atau ‘orang yang ingin membunuh’ beliau telah terlupa misi mereka atau mungkin juga sedang bercuti bersama keluarga di musim cuti sekolah ini. Atau mungkin juga disebabkan minyak mahal, ‘pembunuh’ tersebut terpaksa menunggu di Kuala Lumpur kerana tidak mampu berkejar ke Permatang Pauh.

Saiful yang tertekan dengan ‘penghakiman tanpa bicara’ telah memilih cara yang difikirkan Islamik dengan membuat sumpah laknat. Mungkin bagi beliau, itulah cara untuk menegaskan bahawa beliau berkata benar. Rakyat marhaen patut melihat bahawa sumpah tersebut sebenarnya bukan berbentuk pembuktian sebagaimana dalam kes-kes mahkamah.

Bagaimana mungkin kita mengatakan perbuatan bersumpah itu pembuktian sebagaimana kes lian kalau ianya belum pun dibawa ke Mahkamah Syariah. Perbuatan bersumpah tersebut hanyalah luahan rasa Saiful untuk membela dirinya dalam masyarakat bahawa beliau berkata benar dan tidak ada jalan lain yang boleh membuktikan ketegasan beliau walaupun kes itu dibicarakan di mahkamah dan Anwar didapati bersalah. Beliau telah sepenuhnya menyerahkan dirinya kepada Allah SWT.

Saiful tentunya sedar bahawa apakah ada jaminan bahawa sekiranya Anwar didapati bersalah, pihak pembangkang tidak akan mereka cerita konspirasi sebagaimana sebelum ini? Paling teruk, bagaimana kalau Anwar didapati tidak bersalah atas dasar kelonggaran pembuktian atau atas dasar teknikal yang lain?

Rakyat marhaen perlu ingat bahawa Anwar dilepaskan semasa rayuan dalam kes liwat sebelum ini atas dasar teknikal dan para hakim mempercayai bahawa perbuatan liwat tersebut benar-benar berlaku. Kalau senario itu berlaku sekali lagi, tentunya Saiful akan terus dicemuh terlibat dengan rekaan konspirasi tersebut.

Perbuatan Saiful bersumpah perlu dilihat sebagai cara menguatkan keyakinan beliau sendiri dan menegaskan kepada rakyat marhaen bahawa beliau sememangnya bercakap benar. Janganlah disamakan sumpah tersebut sebagai pembuktian dalam mahkamah kerana kalau begitulah keadaannya, bagaimana pula sumpah yang dilakukan oleh Nik Aziz Nik Mat semasa memegang jawatan Menteri Besar Kelantan? Kepada siapakah beliau nak buktikan sumpah tersebut? Pembuktian untuk kes apa sumpah tersebut dilakukan? Lainlah kalau Nik Aziz bersumpah bahawa menantunya Ariff Fahmi tidak dilantik secara ‘kroni’ dan tidak terlibat dalam siasatan BPR dalam kes Perbadanan Menteri Besar baru-baru ini?

Sumpah Saiful yang menimbulkan pelbagai reaksi juga perlu diteliti secara lebih rasional. Apa pun pandangan yang dikemukakan oleh pelbagai pihak, tidak ada satu pihak pun yang mengatakan bahawa sumpah tersebut terbatal atau tidak boleh dipakai. Perbincangan tentang cara, tempat dan lainnya mungkin boleh dikatakan perkara furu’ atau mungkin juga khilaf sahaja.

Pokok persoalan besar ialah lafaz sumpah tersebut telah mengikut garis panduan Islam sebagaimana yang dikehendaki dan tiada perbahasan tentang hal itu. Ini menunjukkan bahawa sumpah tersebut adalah diterima sebagai sumpah yang benar dalam Islam.

Persoalan tentang memegang Al Quran sebagaimana penganut Kristian memegang Bible sebenarnya bukan masalah besar tetapi hanya diperbesarkan untuk menutup isu sebenar.

Apakah semua amalan yang hampir bersamaan dengan amalan agama lain harus dilihat menuruti agama tersebut? Apakah bersumpah di masjid yang merupakan Rumah Allah tidak seluruhnya mengikut ajaran Islam? Apakah untuk mengelakkan dari menyerupai bersumpah di gereja, Saiful perlu bersumpah di rumah beliau? Atau mungkin di luar masjid? Atau di tengah padang sebagaimana rutin sembahyang minta hujan? Atau ada sebahagian sahabat nakal yang mahu dilaksanakan di dalam tandas? Takkanlah kerana ‘mengaminkan’ doa makan sudah boleh disamakan dengan amalan Kristian yang turut sama ‘mengaminkan’ doa mereka?

Janganlah lagi umat Islam dipesongkan oleh perkara-perkara kecil melebihi perkara pokok demi kepentingan politik kepartian. Perlu kah kita masih berbincang soal bagaimana berniat dalam sembahyang sedangkan Islam sebenarnya difahami oleh 4 mazhab utama yang kadang-kadang berbeza pandangan tentang perlaksanaan? Persoalan pokok ialah sembahyang itu wajib dan itu yang menjadi isu utama. Kenapa perlu dipersoalkan tempat dan apa yang Saiful pegang?

Perbahasan tentang tempat dan apa yang dipegang oleh Saiful juga menarik minat rakyat marhaen untuk menganalisis isu tersebut. Sumpah Saiful dilaporkan telah disaksikan oleh imam-imam Masjid Wilayah Persekutuan di samping dihadiri oleh Pengarah JAWI, Datuk Che Mat Che Ali. Tak diketahui pula setakat mana ilmu agama yang ada di dada ahli-ahli agama yang hadir tersebut.

Kalaulah benar sumpah tersebut tidak menepati kehendak dan aturan Islam, kenapa para ‘agamawan’ tersebut tidak menasihati Saiful untuk melakukan secara ‘betul-betul Islamik’?

Persoalan lebih besar dari itu juga ialah kalaulah sumpah Saiful tidak menjadi mengikut aturan Islam, rakyat marhaen mencadangkan kepada para ulamak dan ‘agamawan’ dalam parti PAS dan masyarakat seluruhnya supaya membimbing Anwar Ibrahim bersumpah mengikut cara Islam yang sebenar. Mungkin selepas itu, barulah Saiful boleh bersumpah secara Islam sebenar.

Our malaysian Furry DSAI was released on personal bail? how?

“To summarise our judgement , even
though reading the appeal record we find evidence to confirm that the
appelants were involved in homosexual activities and we are more
inclined to believe that the alleged incident at Tivoli Villa did
happen BUT, the Federal Court could only convict Anwar and Sukma if the
prosecution had successfully proved beyond reasonable doubt the alleged
offences stated in the charges based on admissible evidence and in
accordance with established principles of law. “

- Hakim Datuk Abdul Hamid Mohamad dan Tengku Datuk Baharuddin Shah Tengku Mahmud -

he is………a furry.

No more Islamic country? They say?
everyone get your AK’s! we’re going to do an ambush to their offices! Liars!

Sumber : www.mykmu.net

By: Nihaz Mohd Yusoff

PAS-PKR-DAP had made a vow: “All for one and One for All” or in
other words, the Pakatan Rakyat’s formation. So now, forget about
Islamic Country, DAP told PAS. Would PAS bow to DAP on this issue? I
have no doubt they would, they just have to find the right words to
justify it.

Either Islamic Country or Malaysian Malaysia, PAS would have to
choose as DAP would never tolerate their stand. PKR however have
nothing to say since the sole reason of their existence is to make
Anwar Ibrahim the PM - by hook or by crook. Be it Islamic Country or
Malaysian Malaysia or even the current system/ideology under BN, is not
at all a factor if only Anwar Ibrahim was the PM. This is a very funny
reason to form a party and only idiots of the lowest level could
support this particular party with no ideology.

PAS and PKR had actually passed their first and foremost test in
proving their seriousness in holding on to their vow by agreeing with
the mega pig project. PAS even came out with all sorts of verses to
approve the project although it looks like they were trying to convince
themselves rather than the rakyat on the decision.

DAP has always known that deep in PAS’s heart they had already
willingly forgotten about Islamic Country the day they made the vow,
but DAP still needs them to say it out loud just for the official
record and just to show who is the master here.

DAP has always known that PKR is easy as their only condition is
Anwar must be the PM if the Pakatan Rakyat ever rules Malaysia. But,
PAS is even easier – they offered no condition at all.

From my point of view, it looks like PKR is the Jewish’s and DAP’s
dog, PAS is the PKR’s and DAP’s dog, and now UMNO (read: Abdullah) too
has proven at the Dinner organized by the Bar Council recently, to be a
dog belongs to Pakatan Rakyat so does this mean that DAP is the master
of all these dogs since they are the only one that is not a dog?

If this is true then I was not being over-reacting or exaggerating
things when I declared that I could no longer support UMNO in my recent
article. This is because, UMNO is no longer UMNO under Abdullah Badawi
though the name remains the same.

It’s true that not supporting UMNO anymore is not the answer to all
these mess. And for the love of my country, I could not choose to
ignore or remain totally exceptional forever. Therefore, among the
three Parties with the Malay majority, PAS, PKR and UMNO which that has
more sense to get back on the right track sooner or later? There is
just no way for the Malays to form another party and make ourselves
weaker than we already are. So, what do we do?

This is a desperate time for us, and we have to acknowledge that,
before we continue with whatever it is that we plan. If this were to
happen in an organization under my control, I would have called all
Malay leaders for an urgent meeting for a brainstorming session to find
the most suitable solution. But no, it isn’t me who is running the
show, I’m just a tiny little nobody from nowhere. And it is not even
UMNO’s or the government’s show, it is a one man show – Abdullah
Badawi’s show. And the producers and directors want him to continue the
show so he obeys or he would not get the bone..err..I mean, the pay.

I’ve talked to many friends from these three parties, and most of
them have one thing in-common despite their different political stands.
They just want a better life (economically) and a clean government.

Fine, but would PKR be able to provide that? What they forget was
that PKR leaders were originally from UMNO. They were the ones
mentioned in the long list of Anwar’s cronies back in the day when he
tried to frame Tun Dr. Mahathir but was presented with this list that
shut them up for a while. Anwar is a liar. He lied about his arsenic
poisoning and who can explain how his chronic back-ache was totally
recovered only a few hours after operation?

Anwar is the one going around the world meeting with the Americans,
the Jews and even the Actor-President-Corrupt, Estrada seeking support
and they were more than happy and willing to give it to him. Anwar has
been their darling then, and their darling now and Anwar was the one
who almost sold our soul to the IMF. We could have gone bankrupt like
Indonesia if he did. Why the west love him so much? Ask yourself, would
America and Jewish support a true Islamic Leader?

So the answer is no clean government and no better economic
management could be achieved under PKR. PKR fights for Anwar, not the
people, and that sums it all.

Now, what about PAS? Most of the Malays believe that PAS is….well,
quite.. clean compared to UMNO or PKR in money matters. Well
maybe….maybe not, if we choose to look at Tabung Memali and donation
collected from their ceramahs. But what they intentionally forget was
that PAS was the one who wanted to use Anwar’s misconduct as a
political weapon against UMNO using the famous confession of Sukma
Darmawan to Taib Azamuddin. Thanks to Mat Sabu that Anwar got his
famous nick-name “Alju—ri”. When Tun Dr. Mahathir acted earlier than
PAS by getting rid of Anwar, PAS without hesitation teamed up with
Anwar despite their knowledge of the truth in order to bring down the
government. So PAS is not clean after all, they are far worst than the
rest as they did all these by using the name of Islam and Allah S.W.T.

And how about economic management by PAS? Would they be able to
bring Malaysia to the next level or at least bring back the country to
its glory (the pride and the economic strength) as it was before 2004?
No, Kelantan is a living proof that Allah has shown us all along that
economy is the least of PAS’s concern.

So no clean government and no better economic management could ever
be achieved under PAS either. PAS exists just to create havoc and chaos
in the Muslim society in Malaysia. Fullstop.

UMNO, however is a different case. UMNO has been performing well all
its life though it is not seen as the most perfect when it comes to
being and looking clean but it has been more than capable to bring
stability and prosperity to the country despite all the accusation of
corruptions, nepotisme and cronisme - until very recently in 2004
onwards. Why it is deteriorating is obvious – the leader is not
leading, instead he is following and worst is that he is following the
enemies.

To try to correct PAS and PKR is almost impossible as they started
from the wrong track from the beginning. Now that they have made the
vow with DAP, they have proven to be nothing but hopeless dogs.

But to bring UMNO back on track is actually not hard at all. 

UMNO have been told of the reasons for its defeat. UMNO have been
told about how to overcome this problem. The voters have spoken and the
voters have shown the way for UMNO leaders to get back the voters’
trust; that is, firstly and no compromise is to get rid of the one and
only rotten head. It might take some time to identify the other rotten
organs but without the head, these rotten organs would die eventually.
In time, the good tissues would be able to heal and grow slowly but
surely.

It is not that hard, all we need to do is to come together and speak
out, loud and clear and press it on and on and press it hard. But why
can’t UMNO leaders do just that? Are they leaders or are they
followers? Why the delay? Why the word-game?

Why is it so hard for Malays to take action when they know what is
the right action? Why the Malays like to pass the right time and acted
at the wrong time? Why the Malays like to learn things the hard way? Do
we need to wait till Pakatan Rakyat took over and found that we had
totally lost our country and our pride before learning the lesson? Do
we really need to be wiped out before realizing what we’ve done to
ourselves?

Some even dare to suggest that any harsh, earnest attempt (like what
Tun Dr. Mahathir is doing) to correct the critical situation is
childish, even foolish? But the same people who criticized Tun M, do
not have any other better idea on how to make the deaf, dumb but
‘powerfools’ realize that he is doing all the wrong things at the wrong
time to the wrong people with all the wrong reasons. At least Tun M is
doing something compared to them who just watch and do nothing.

What more prove do we need or what else are we waiting for when God
has shown us the truth all along – loud and clear too! The
inconsistencies in PAS, the lies by PKR, the ‘flip-flop’ of UMNO
(Abdullah) - these are God’s ways to show us the truth and to ask us to
ponder, to think, to decide and to do what is right. Why we always
choose to ignore the evidence? Why do we always deny the blessings when
we had them and refuse to act when we should?

Sometimes I wonder, whether the Malays are purposely asking for their doom?

Damn the people who have the power to act but never did.  .

So cheers!  All for One and One for All!   Damn one, damn us all.

Well, accordng to my research, if anwar’s allegation of arsenic poisoning is true, and the threshold level is reached (to produce significant effects) he should be dead by now. And how did he heal from his chronic back ache? and why did he seek treatment at Australia? (not for treatment izzit? I think he went to gold coast to meet his cartoon hero Batman at Movieworld. Hey I love Batman too!).

For god’s sake, PAS must change for the better. Practice what we preach. Say the truth even it’s bitter. Destroy the Evil Eye and the Nuclear Rocket. Merge with the Scales.

don’t let a furry be our PM. Let it be a good-mannered Ulama Statesman. (I know! Macha!)

yours’ truly

Pemuda Pas newb

Ohhhhh…….now I really want Tajol Rosli back. Or Mr Muhammad Roli as MB. for gawd’s sake!

(pembelamelayu.com)

IPOH 11 Julai – Seorang pelajar Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI) di
Tanjung Malim kecewa selepas gagal menuntut wang ganjaran sebanyak RM1,000
seperti yang dijanjikan oleh kerajaan negeri Perak di Bangunan Darul Ridzuan di
sini hari ini.

Pelajar berkenaan, Norzyah Sabri, 20, yang baru sahaja mendaftar dalam
program ijazah Sarjana Muda Pendidikan (bahasa Inggeris sebagai bahasa kedua) di
UPSI pada 29 Jun lepas yang ditemani bapanya, Sabri Puteh, 39, terpaksa pulang
hampa selepas diberitahu ganjaran tersebut tiada.

Noryzah berkata, semasa meminta bantuan petugas kaunter di pekarangan
bangunan pentadbiran kerajaan negeri itu untuk berjumpa dengan Exco Pendidikan
Perak, Nga Kor Ming, dia dan bapanya diminta pulang dan melupakan hasrat untuk
mendapatkan wang ganjaran tersebut.

“Kata petugas itu mana ada ganjaran sedemikian dan tidak perlu buang masa
jumpa Exco berkaitan,” katanya di sini hari ini.

Pada sidang akhbar khas yang diadakan di pejabatnya Isnin lalu, Menteri Besar
Perak, Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin mengumumkan kerajaan negeri memberi
ganjaran RM1,000 seorang kepada anak negeri ini yang berjaya melanjutkan
pelajaran ke mana-mana institusi pengajian tinggi awam (IPTA).

Katanya, bagi menuntut wang ganjaran itu, pelajar perlu datang sendiri
berjumpa dengan Kor Ming dengan membawa dokumen pengenalan diri serta surat
tawaran ke IPTA.

Menurut Noryzah, selepas apa yang berlaku hari ini, rasa teruja mendapatkan
ganjaran RM1,000 itu sejak empat hari lalu lenyap serta-merta.

“Wang ganjaran ini heboh diperkatakan di kalangan kawan-kawan sejak Menteri
Besar mengumumkannya. Malah, ramai guru dan rakan di universiti lain menghantar
khidmat pesanan ringkas (SMS) mengingatkan saya supaya jangan lupa menuntut
ganjaran yang dijanjikan itu.

“Dengan apa yang berlaku hari ini, nampaknya kerajaan negeri mahu aniaya
pelajar seperti saya sedangkan saya mendapatkan semua dokumen termasuk
pengesahan kemasukan dan sebagainya daripada pihak UPSI tetapi segala usaha
sia-sia,” katanya.

P/S : Orang yang memperjuangkan Islam tak baik menipu.

Nga Kor Ming says - "Acah je! Ha Ha! I’mma spend my money on my brand new Teresa Teng DVD collection FTW!"

Hmm. A thousand? ringgit?

Para askar2 hijau sume. Fikir2kan la yek. dgn pikiran terbuka. nih pendapat dia.

"Faisal Tehrani menulis ;

Saya hanya seorang pengarang. Ini pandangan saya. Seorang pengarang.

Mula-mula terima babi, akhirnya PAS akan memperakukan Lina Joy. Saya
akan beritahu anda bagaimana ini bakal berlaku. Sila bersabar.

Ini pandangan saya. Seorang pengarang kecil. Bahasa politik
melibatkan apa yang dinamai orang Jerman sebagai machtvorming iaitu
menghimpun kekuasaan, dan machtaanwending iaitu menggunakan kekuasaan.
Nah, suka? Saya juga boleh menggunakan jargon-jargon hebat dalam bahasa
Jerman seperti Anwar Ibrahim, memandangkan seluruh dunia termasuk
Jerusalem Post memuji beliau, maka saya wajar menjadikan beliau contoh.
Sekadar contoh. Saya boleh membawa contoh pengguna jargon politik
seperti pencipta kata ‘glokal’, tetapi macam tak relevan. Saya juga
boleh menggunakan jargon bahasa Turki kalau mahu, tetapi ya, saya bukan
orang politik.

Oleh kerana bahasa politik adalah menghimpun kekuasaan maka di
Indonesia, sempena majlis memperingati 100 tahun Hamka saya boleh
berkata begini, “Buku Buya Hamka, Tafsir Al Azhar menemani saya selama
dua kali di penjara”.

Kemudian kerana saya lebih sastera daripada seluruh orang sastera di
dunia ini saya akan berpesan pula dengan penuh kekudusan “Sastra itu
baik, dan harus dimulai dari kecil.”

Hebat bukan cara saya memuja ulama besar Indonesia, Profesor Haji
Abdul Malik Karim Amrullah alias Buya Hamka? (sila lihat TEMPO
Interaktif Rabu, 09 April 2008). Saya beri saudara apa yang saudara
mahu, saudara mahu Islam dan ulama? Saya beri. Dengan jargon hebat yang
melongokan. Disuntik sedikit emosi: arghhh hari-hari lampau yang
menyedihkan itu…

Jua oleh kerana bahasa politik ialah menggunakan kekuasaan, saya
akan berkata begini pula di khalayak yang lain, katakanlah di
Australia: “I see Shakespeare as a major figure of international and
humanitarian dimension. In the solitude of my prison cell clearly
Shakespeare appeared to me as a brilliant genius of all times and for
all cultures. I am in debt to Shakespeare in that sense because I was
able to fly away from that small constraint of those four walls during
incarceration to become this major spectator of this classic work of
that great genius.”

Begitu lah bunyi ‘keynote di VIII World Shakespeare Congress’ (Rujuk
The VIII World Shakespeare Congress, Brisbane City Hall, July 16-21
2006)

Suka bukan? Kerana saudara mahu Barat, saya beri saudara seorang
tokoh jenius Barat. Dan untuk lebih membikin hati sayu, saya suntik
sedikit kesyahduan untuk membangkitkan keterharuan.

Latar sama. Tapi tema lain-lain. Bergantung apa yang saudara mahu dengar.

Begitulah bahasa yang saya gunakan. Orang akan terpana. Begitu
bahasa politik. Untuk khalayak berbeza saya akan ‘temberang’ beza.

Bahasa politik beginilah yang akan memperdayakan PAS untuk mula-mula
mempertahankan babi, akhirnya ya siapa tahu mungkin Salman Rushdie,
opsss silap…Lina Joy. Bagaimana?

Bahasa politik. Ia adalah permainan politik. Lebih pragmatik bahasa
itu, lebih indah karya seni itu. Dan lebih memukau pembaca. Lebih
mempersona penganalisis. Rakyat? Damn you rakyat.

Apa yang telah berlaku selepas PRU 12? Penghargaan.

Begini, untuk memberi penghargaan dan ucapan terima kasih, kita
mesti mendahulukan yang telah ‘memberi’, yakni yang telah meletakkan
kita di ‘tempat kekuasaan’ (walaupun kata Fran, sekadar di pinggiran).
Pengundi, dan ‘big boss’ yang ‘memberi’ ini harus diberi hadiah.

Perak telah beri. Pulau Pinang telah beri. Kemudian giliran Selangor.

Saya tidak kata salah hal ladang babi itu. Tidak salah,
tambah-tambah kalau betul caranya. Pengikut Theresa Kok makan babi tiga
ekor dalam kenduri kemenangan mereka pun saya tak marah. Makanlah.
Makan sampai tercekik dan senak pun saya tak larang. Siapa pula marah.
Siapalah saya. Harakah dan Timbalan Presiden PAS pun sokong ladang
babi. Sampai sanggup pekak telinga rungutan dan rasa marah jijik PAS
kawasan Sepang. Bukan begitu Dr Halimah? Tak akan tak ada muslimat
Sepang bisik-bisik? Bohonglah kalau tak ada.

Oleh kerana kita bersungguh-sungguh mahu ‘mendahulukan’ kepentingan
mereka, kita telah mengajar mereka ini mua. Tahu mua? Buka kamus.
Lagipun blog ini temanya ’sastera’.

Kemudian setelah babi, beri betis hendak paha tentunya. Akan ada
permintaan lain. Itu ini. Atas nama hak asasi maka akan masuk gereja
untuk memberitahu, ya ini hak asasi. Kita pun mahukan kesamarataan.
Mahu guna perkataan Allah di gereja? Sila…lagipun ini sekadar bahasa.
Kebetulan kata Tuhan dalam bahasa Arab itu Allah.

Tak salah masuk gereja. Siapa kata salah. Sebelum think tank PAS
masuk gereja saya dah terlebih dahulu masuk. Di Jerman dulu saya masuk
gereja. Bukan gereja biasa tapi gereja Dr Luther. Saya mahu memahami
pertelingkahan Protestan dan Katholik. Saya keluar masuk gereja di
Munster. Kemudian, saya tulis Tuhan Manusia. Saya beritahu pembaca yang
Protestan mula-mula moderat, atau liberalis kemudian jadi esktrimis.
George Bush itu Protestan. Paul Wolfowitz sang neo-con Protestan ke?
Saya tak pasti. Boleh tanya Timbalan Presiden PAS, dia dokong ladang
babi Sepang. Mungkin dia akan dokong juga Wolfowitz dengan agenda
ekonomi US supremacy. Kenapa? Sebab itu bahasa politik si ‘dia’. Jaga
hati ketua, beri wala’ kepada sang strategis yang memungkinkan semua
ini, bukankah afdhal?

Kita utamakan kepentingan mereka dahulu. Kepentingan orang Islam?
Ala, kemudianlah. Macam-macam alasan diberi. Maka PAS pun terperangkap.
Kasihan Halimah Ali, masuk PAS lalu jadi exco, lalu jadi pembela babi.
Tentu dia tak dapat tidur malam.

PAS terperangkap dalam jerat hak asasi, kesemarataan, atau hadiah
pemberian. Rai dan rai dan rai segala keraian. Jangan bimbang, atas
nama menjaga kesemarataan, atas nama harapan baru, dan berkebajikan
maka mungkin Lina Joy yang lain pun kita dapat raikan. Lina Joy yang
hari tu dah end of the story. Tambah-tambah alasan hak asasi itu akan
jadi lebih berkesan dan munasabah kalau ’si pengguna jargon politik’
datang dan temberang, PAS pun malu alah. PAS pun segan. Maklum, dapat
kuasa sedikit-sedikit ini pun kerana pakatan sama-sama.

Bahasa politik. Celaka. Sungguh celaka bahasa politik ini tuan-tuan.
Dengan bahasa politik kelak, tuan-tuan akan mengkhianati kata hati
tuan-tuan (meski tuan-tuan tahu kebenaran entri saya ini) dengan alasan
seperti; satu - ‘ala ft cuma novelis, dia bukan tahu apa’ atau dua -
‘ala budak tu pelik, dia asyik kata nak ikut ahlul bait’ atau
macam-macam lagi bentuk diskredit lain. Bahasa politik sentiasa celaka.
Teman saya seorang pomen kereta kata, ‘bahasa politik itu babi’.
Bezanya pada kata-kata sahaja. Macam beza bahasa politik untuk Majlis
Silaturahim Antara Agama (IRGC) dengan Suruhanjaya Antara Agama (IFC)
yang mendapat bantahan daripada pelbagai pihak sebelum ini.

Saya janji akan selalu bangun malam dan maki hamun bahasa politik
yang merebut kekuatan Islam ini dalam doa. Jangan perlekehkan doa saya.
Tak percaya tanya ‘lima orang ulama’ itu. Mereka lebih arif, itu pun
kalau mereka tak tahu malu. Kita semua tahu ke mana arah tujuan semua
ini. Tak akan berhenti setakat babi. Kesamarataan ini yang Ali Taqi
lawan dalam Tuhan Manusia, tetapi PAS akan menobatkan apa yang Ali Taqi
lawan. Ali Taqi putus asa? Tidak.

PAS sudah kalah. Dengan melihat bahasa politik iaitu menghimpun
kekuasaan dan menggunakan kekuasaan, PAS sudah tidak boleh diharap
dengan FASAL 5 nya lagi. Saya pun tidak harap lagi. Meski sejak tahun
87 dulu (seperti syarat parti yakni sebaik sahaja baligh) saya tertarik
dengan FASAL 5 itu. Hari ini, tahun 2008 saya tahu FASAL 5 itu hiasan
sahaja. FASAL 5 sudah terkorban. Pembetulan: FASAL 5 sudah dikorban.

Kenapa sampai orang PAS kena tipu dengan bahasa politik yang cakap
lain sana cakap lain sini? Satu, silibus usrah PAS sudah ketinggalan
zaman. Dua, PAS memang sudah tinggalkan usrah. Boleh tanya berapa kerat
cawangan yang ada usrah. Tiga, orang PAS tidak peduli falsafah. Macam
post-moden, bahasa politik cakap sana lain, cakap sini lain itu ialah
bahasa politik post-moden. Orang PAS yang tidak mahu berfikiran global
dan asyik mencari massa secara sentimen semata-mata tak dapat
menanggapi sepak terajang ala post-moden. Jadi, masuk perangkap
semuanya. Dengan tok-tok guru sekali.

Memang jijik bahasa politik ini. Macam Presiden PAS, dua kali sudah
saya dengar beliau mengajak ahli-ahli parlimen BN masuk Pakatan Rakyat.
Katanya, mereka yang akan jadi katak lompat ini tidak akan dibayar.
Fuhh, sudah pandai bahasa politik Machiavelli rupanya. Lompat parti
samada berbayar atau tidak berbayar adalah keji, adalah satu korupsi.
Ia salah. Yang bermaruah, beretika dan tidak keji ialah letak jawatan
dan bertanding sekali lagi. Baru jantan. Aneh, ada ulama mengulang
bahasa politik begini. Sudah macam watak Azman dalam drama saya, MISI.
Disuruh jalan itik, dia jalan itik, disuruh menyalak, dia pun menyalak.
Engku Daffa menunggang Subra, Mary dan Azman. Begitulah semuanya kena
tunggang, oleh bahasa politik. Sudahnya Azman yang ingin merawat, jadi
korup juga. Jadi penjenayah. Ah persis!

Siapa mengajar? Tolong jawab, siapa ajar tok guru kita jadi korup begini? Pak Syeikh mana? Abuya mana?

Mengapa orang PAS sokong korupsi ini? Ini korupsi moral dalam berpolitik. Sungguh jengkel!

Jangan bersedih. Masih ada harapan.

Saya menunggu lebih 500 orang pembeli Tuhan Manusia di Pesta Buku
minggu lalu. Saya menunggu pembaca Tuhan Manusia edisi lalu. Lebih tiga
ribu naskah terjual. Campur-campur, ada dalam empat ribu orang. Terima
kasih. Saya tak perlu banyak. Dapat 12 orang pun jadi. Kalau lebih,
bagus lagi. Mereka ini faham Ali Taqi. Mereka faham bahasa pluralisme
yang digunakan oleh liberalis. Faham bahasa politik yang bak kata Ziana
Zain penuh madah berhelah. Bahasa di mana di depan khalayak suka Islam
adalah bahasa Hamka, dan bila bahasa depan khalayak khayal Barat adalah
Shakespeare.

Yang saya tidak sangka ialah PAS membiarkan dirinya ditunggangi ke
tahap ini. Membiarkan diri ditunggang atau diperbodohkan sepertinya
siaran ulangan yang menimpa Masjumi, Jabhah Islam lil Inqas, Ikhwanul
Muslimin dan Jamaat Islami (di mana semua gerakan Islam ini berjuang,
berjuang, berjuang tetapi last-last kemenangan mereka kena ‘curi’).
Orang mukmin konon tak akan masuk dalam lubang yang sama dua kali.
Kasihan orang PAS sudah lupa ini semua. Kerana kurangnya bahasa usrah
dan tarbiyyah sejak bahasa politik mengambil tempat. Tahniahlah. Kalau
tuan-tuan dalam state of denial, tuan-tuan akan buat alasan untuk
menolak kebenaran dalam entri ini. Alasan seperti, ala FT tu ikut
sekian-sekian. Apa teguran saya sedikit pun tak mahu difikirkan. Sebab?
Kepentingan diri. Apa lagi? Kalau nak kata kepentingan Islam, tunjuk
mana Islamnya ajak lompat parti?

PAS sudah kalah dan terkehel dari jalan FASAL 5 tak apa. Nak harap
ada pimpinan PAS yang berani melakukan ’syahid politik’ menentang arus
belum tentu. Tak apalah. Saya tahu kumpulan Ali Taqi ini akan melawan,
tambah-tambah melihatkan PAS sudah kalah begini, atau mengalah begitu.
Seperti Ali Taqi, protagonis Tuhan Manusia mereka akan matang cepat.

Saudara yang bijak menggunakan jargon politik, saudara ingat saya seorang?

SAUDARA, PAK SYEIKH, BIG BOSS, BRO…apa sahaja gelarnya, SAUDARA SILAP. KAMI TAK AKAN BERI SAUDARA JALAN MUDAH."

made me question myself. has our party derailed from its causes? Why did Yaakob Sapari advocate pig farming? Pemuda Pas newb is smelling something fishy. Faizal smelt it, and says that we’re hypocrites. What do you think?

Pigs? In mah state?

We all made a mistake, for trusting our future in this weasel. Or you could say he is the real life Orochi.

Hmm. needs moar ulamaks. Oh words just can’t describe the horror when  the voice of Islam is suppressed (DSAI accused Malaysia of being Islamist/Fundamentalist and pointed it to Umno and PAS), and the Free Trade squashes our economy, forcing us to sell Warong Perasan Kg Baru to Burger King’s, and oh how hurtful is it when the next american naval base will be constructed at Port DIckson.

Lim Kit siang looks like he’s singing "CRRRAAAAAWWWLING IN MY SKIIIIN!"

Teresa Cock is there also…remember how she hates tulisan Jawi? The place in Perak, Jawi, will be changed its name into RUMI.

Hey!Why is the one for religious affairs not from PAS? This is madness! (Hudud pun diorg x bagi jalan jugak :-(  )

Yong Taik Lee….yep, full of crap as usual.

Gwo Burne Loh? He’ll cut our Ptptn in half, demolish UM cuz it’s old, demolish UKM cuz it doesn’t want to use English, and elect only hot babes as Naib Canselors.

GObind singh deo should continue his lawyer business. Menteri Koperasi? A lawyer?

Tian Chua eh? I wish he was as friendly as my friend Tan Chee Yuen…he’s not very friendly IRL.

Chrono Legionnaire help us! turn back time!

Yours sincerely,

newbie pemuda pas

Click for fullview y’all

I found my place in the world
Could stare at your face for the rest of
my days
Now I can breathe, turn my insides out
and Smother me
Warm and alive I’m all over you
Would you smother me?

When I’m alone time goes so slow
I need you here with me
And how my mistakes have made
your heart break
Still I need you here with me …..

nak terberak lak dgr lagu jiwang the Used nih. X seswai dgn jiwa SOAD+Hijjaz+Tiesto aku. Tapi dgr lama2 sedap juga.

drama queens must die.